September Transcript | |
File Size: | 5254 kb |
File Type: |
Court summarizes hearing as Ex Parte to confirm Court dates
1(11)-1(14)
Court acknowledges that Respondent requested escrow reimbursement
1(14)-1(19)
Court acknowledges Respondent request for Shenandoah property as sole and separate, references earlier dismissal
1(20)-1(28)
1(11)-1(14)
Court acknowledges that Respondent requested escrow reimbursement
1(14)-1(19)
Court acknowledges Respondent request for Shenandoah property as sole and separate, references earlier dismissal
1(20)-1(28)
Court references contested May Judgment interpretation
2(1)-2(2)
Court acknowledges that process needs finishing
2(3)-2(5)
Petitioner counsel re-raises Franchise Tax Board issue
2(19)-2(24)
Court states that Court considers giving escrow funds to Petitioner
2(25)-2(26)
2(1)-2(2)
Court acknowledges that process needs finishing
2(3)-2(5)
Petitioner counsel re-raises Franchise Tax Board issue
2(19)-2(24)
Court states that Court considers giving escrow funds to Petitioner
2(25)-2(26)
Respondent informs Court that there is no Franchise Tax Board issue, states that Franchise Tax Board in fact took Respondent money directly
3(16)-3(23)
3(16)-3(23)
Respondent informs Court that Barrington escrow is Respondent money
4(1)
Respondent informs Court that Respondent has been blocked from receiving money
4(3)-4(9)
Respondent informs Court that Respondent feels neglected by Court, Respondent states he believes actions of Petitioner counsel hurt community
4(11)-4(17)
Court states that Court will not hear facts on earlier Court action
4(18)-4(23)
4(1)
Respondent informs Court that Respondent has been blocked from receiving money
4(3)-4(9)
Respondent informs Court that Respondent feels neglected by Court, Respondent states he believes actions of Petitioner counsel hurt community
4(11)-4(17)
Court states that Court will not hear facts on earlier Court action
4(18)-4(23)
Respondent affirms that he respects Court decisions but feels neglected
5(5)-5(6)
Court suggests that issues be raised with Appeals Court
5(7)-5(11)
Respondent affirms to Court that Judgment shows that Barrington funds are Respondent funds
5(20)
5(5)-5(6)
Court suggests that issues be raised with Appeals Court
5(7)-5(11)
Respondent affirms to Court that Judgment shows that Barrington funds are Respondent funds
5(20)
Respondent reminds Court that there are problems with funds being sent to Israel
6(2)-6(9)
Respondent thinks Court has repeated claimed to have insufficient time to deal with matters of case
6(9)-6(12)
Respondent reminds Court that Respondent has no money for further counsel
6(15)-6(22)
Petitioner counsel claims Petitioner is trying to end trial quickly
6(26)-6(28)
6(2)-6(9)
Respondent thinks Court has repeated claimed to have insufficient time to deal with matters of case
6(9)-6(12)
Respondent reminds Court that Respondent has no money for further counsel
6(15)-6(22)
Petitioner counsel claims Petitioner is trying to end trial quickly
6(26)-6(28)
Petitioner counsel claims Petitioner counsel wants out of case
7(1)-7(13)
Respondent points out that there is no gain from continued arguing, and that Respondent has attempted to provide funds to Petitioner and to children
7(14)-7(16)
Respondent reminds Court that Respondent is paying mortgage, and the Respondent feels by doing so he is providing for a home that is not good for his child
7(20)-7(22)
Respondent reminds Court that he has been harmed by Court process, as Respondent believe children have
8(4)-8(14)
Court refers to disputed May Judgment
8(15)-8(20)
Court does not respond to Respondent discussion on harm
8(21)-8(27)
8(4)-8(14)
Court refers to disputed May Judgment
8(15)-8(20)
Court does not respond to Respondent discussion on harm
8(21)-8(27)
Respondent reminds Court that he has been given opportunity to buy Shenandoah property
8(28)-9(2)
Court affirms that August decision allows Respondent to buy Shenandoah property
9(6)-9(9)
Respondent reminds Court that he wishes to buy house, contribute 50,000 for welfare of child
9(6)-9(9)
Respondent tells Court that Petitioner can go to bank at any time, unlike has been explained by Petitioner counsel
9(15)-9(22)
Respondent reminds Court that Petitioner has been occupying Shenandoah property for twenty-seven months
9(24)-9(25)
8(28)-9(2)
Court affirms that August decision allows Respondent to buy Shenandoah property
9(6)-9(9)
Respondent reminds Court that he wishes to buy house, contribute 50,000 for welfare of child
9(6)-9(9)
Respondent tells Court that Petitioner can go to bank at any time, unlike has been explained by Petitioner counsel
9(15)-9(22)
Respondent reminds Court that Petitioner has been occupying Shenandoah property for twenty-seven months
9(24)-9(25)
Court accommodate Petitioner counsel scheduling
10(2)-10(3)
Court places all discussed hearings on October 9, 2013
10(4)-10(18)
Court requests Petitioner responses by September 23, 2013
10(19)-10(25)
Court requests Respondent response by October 2, 2013
10(26)-10(28)
10(2)-10(3)
Court places all discussed hearings on October 9, 2013
10(4)-10(18)
Court requests Petitioner responses by September 23, 2013
10(19)-10(25)
Court requests Respondent response by October 2, 2013
10(26)-10(28)
Respondent reminds Court that Respondent feels dedicated to children’s well-being
11(6)-11(9)
Court requests that Respondent secure counsel
11(10)-11(11)
Respondent asks Court to address earlier Court actions, Respondent states that he will do anything within legal power to see case made right
11(12)-11(24)
Court reminds Respondent that he had no legal help
11(25)-11(27)
11(6)-11(9)
Court requests that Respondent secure counsel
11(10)-11(11)
Respondent asks Court to address earlier Court actions, Respondent states that he will do anything within legal power to see case made right
11(12)-11(24)
Court reminds Respondent that he had no legal help
11(25)-11(27)
Respondent tells Court that he feels he is being misunderstood
11(28)-12(2)
Court asks Respondent to secure legal counsel
12(4)-12(12)
Respondent tells Court that all necessary evidence can be had by tracing money issues
12(13)-12(17)
Court states that Respondent must secure legal counsel
12(22)-12(24)
Respondent states to Court that Respondent believes Court has denied actions of Respondent counsel before
12(25)-12(28)
11(28)-12(2)
Court asks Respondent to secure legal counsel
12(4)-12(12)
Respondent tells Court that all necessary evidence can be had by tracing money issues
12(13)-12(17)
Court states that Respondent must secure legal counsel
12(22)-12(24)
Respondent states to Court that Respondent believes Court has denied actions of Respondent counsel before
12(25)-12(28)
Court demands that Respondent secure legal counsel
13(3)-13(6)
Respondent asks that Court begin government investigation of previous Commissioner Cowan
13(7)-13(8)
Court does not acknowledge call for investigation, asks Petitioner counsel to prepare Ruling
13(9)
Petitioner counsel disputes conversation regarding children and evidence of well-being
13(11)-13(13)
Court insists that Respondent secure legal counsel
13(15)-13(16)
Respondent states to Court that necessary evidence is already in filing
13(19)