May Transcript | |
File Size: | 4349 kb |
File Type: |
The Hearing is established as a response to a request by Respondent to modify Judgment to award Shenandoah property as his sole and separate
1(27)-2(2)
1(27)-2(2)
The Court refers to the Judgment, making disputed statement that Shenandoah property was awarded to Petitioner as sole and separate property, and hears that the property has not been sold
2(4)-2(9)
Respondent claims that the mortgage on the property has not been being paid by Petitioner, hurting Respondent credit rating
2(10)-2(11)
Petitioner counsel establishes that house had been listed on market, providing direct information to the Court
2(18)-2(28)
2(4)-2(9)
Respondent claims that the mortgage on the property has not been being paid by Petitioner, hurting Respondent credit rating
2(10)-2(11)
Petitioner counsel establishes that house had been listed on market, providing direct information to the Court
2(18)-2(28)
Petitioner states that house was listed at 850,000 and dropped to 750,000
3(2)-3(3)
Petitioner counsel outlines their interpretation of Judgment, that property belongs to Petitioner until sold
3(10)-3(16)
Respondent tells Court he has saved property from foreclosure many times over an almost three year period
3(18)-3(28)
3(2)-3(3)
Petitioner counsel outlines their interpretation of Judgment, that property belongs to Petitioner until sold
3(10)-3(16)
Respondent tells Court he has saved property from foreclosure many times over an almost three year period
3(18)-3(28)
Respondent tells Court that the disagreement has harmed his relationship with his children
4(7)-4(8)
Respondent explains to the Court that there are issues with a quick sale of the house due to Capital Gains and out-of-pocket expenses required
4(11)-4(14)
Respondent tells Court that he believes Petitioner has no interest in welfare of children, explains Respondent has had to take measures to prevent foreclosure of Shenandoah property via mortgage payments
4(17)-4(19)
Respondent explains that Judgment did not cover this situation
4(27)-5(1)
4(7)-4(8)
Respondent explains to the Court that there are issues with a quick sale of the house due to Capital Gains and out-of-pocket expenses required
4(11)-4(14)
Respondent tells Court that he believes Petitioner has no interest in welfare of children, explains Respondent has had to take measures to prevent foreclosure of Shenandoah property via mortgage payments
4(17)-4(19)
Respondent explains that Judgment did not cover this situation
4(27)-5(1)
Respondent explains that Petitioner has occupied home for twenty-three months
5(4)-5(10)
Court defers to Petitioner counsel for opinion
5(14)-5(16)
Petitioner counsel states that there have been problems with mortgage payments, claims Respondent has not provided receipts of payment
5(17)-5(27)
5(4)-5(10)
Court defers to Petitioner counsel for opinion
5(14)-5(16)
Petitioner counsel states that there have been problems with mortgage payments, claims Respondent has not provided receipts of payment
5(17)-5(27)
Petitioner counsel offers alternative actions to Court
6(3)-6(6)
Respondent outlines that the Shenandoah property was meant to be sold, that the Judgment was not appropriately signed, that Petitioner counsel has confused the properties in question to the Courtourt to the extent of the sale of an additional Wooster property, and that not only this sale but the maintenance and mortgage of the Shenandoah property have been a tremendous hardship to Respondent
6(8)-6(22)
Respondent appeals to the government for help with his case
6(25)-6(26)
6(3)-6(6)
Respondent outlines that the Shenandoah property was meant to be sold, that the Judgment was not appropriately signed, that Petitioner counsel has confused the properties in question to the Courtourt to the extent of the sale of an additional Wooster property, and that not only this sale but the maintenance and mortgage of the Shenandoah property have been a tremendous hardship to Respondent
6(8)-6(22)
Respondent appeals to the government for help with his case
6(25)-6(26)
Respondent requests he be allowed to manage Shenandoah property to prepare it for sale, offers to pay the Fair Market Value for the property
7(1)-7(6)
Court clearly state that Petitioner, Respondent, or Third Party should purchase the house at Fair Market Value and that Respondent has a point in wanting to avoid the further liability of the mortgage
7(17)-7(20)
7(1)-7(6)
Court clearly state that Petitioner, Respondent, or Third Party should purchase the house at Fair Market Value and that Respondent has a point in wanting to avoid the further liability of the mortgage
7(17)-7(20)
Petitioner counsel “anticipates problems with sale” and with a valuation of Shenandoah property based on history
8(11)-8(14)
Courtourt state that both parties have 30 days to present that Fair Market Value for the Shenandoah property and the Ability to Pay if they wish to purchase, and that the highest offer with both will take the Shenandoah property
8(11)-8(20)
Court accommodates Petitioner and counsel on scheduling
9(3)-9(22)
Court acknowledges that current situation may have hurt Parties'’ credit
10(1)-10(5)
Court requests that either side wishing to buy provide proof of adequate financing
10(9)-10(11)
Petitioner counsel represents to Court that Petitioner will not be purchasing house
10(15)-10(17)
Court gives Petitioner permission to reject possible offers
10(20)-10(22)
Court requests broker suggestions from both sides
10(22)-10(25)
Court asks Petitioner counsel to prepare an Order
10(26)-10(28)
10(1)-10(5)
Court requests that either side wishing to buy provide proof of adequate financing
10(9)-10(11)
Petitioner counsel represents to Court that Petitioner will not be purchasing house
10(15)-10(17)
Court gives Petitioner permission to reject possible offers
10(20)-10(22)
Court requests broker suggestions from both sides
10(22)-10(25)
Court asks Petitioner counsel to prepare an Order
10(26)-10(28)
Respondent confirms address submitted to Court at an earlier date at request of Petitioner counsel
11(1)-11(28)